Pirates of the Caribbean or When New Shoes Won't Do: An Ode to Colonizing Liberals in the Dominican Republic
Oh, the likes of them,the likes of them.
Both
southern-bred and
Ivy-fed.
That they'd wed
is no suprise.
And what better gift for the newly-jewelly weds
than their very own
Louisiana Purchase--
due East of Key West.
Their intentions are notcompletely "avaricious."
So Moby says
(but he also sunk--perhaps too soon,
and too easily--one million dollars
into this venture).

Oh say can you survey?
What does a white liberal call the colonizing
and subversive nation-building
of a third-world country?
Why, an "artists colony," of course.
Complete with beach-front bungalows
(only 250 available though;
and absolutely not
to be Meired in white
according to Celerie).
Going, going, gone!For the low low price of $50,000.
That is, if you are of keen intellect,
and socially conscious
and selectively, if not prolifically,
published
and and and
"cash poor."
But, as Boykin says, you must be
most importantly
"clubbable."
Be advised to do as Boykin doeswhich is:
Do not drink the water,
Do not speak the language (Spanish is a devilish tongue and pidgin isn't even
a "real" language, so why bother?),
Do not empower the native peoples as partners,
but keep them subservient
as ornaments,
and drunk
on the free-flowing kettle drum rum
and the vapors of aspiration.
And when the parent scolds the child for littering,
as parents tend to do
Let the children respond with a hearty, if drunken,
"fuck you."
Oh Missus Celerie Ma'am,why bother to "slit the throat"
of this terra firma mistress
When you've already cut out
her heart?
--gosh, I still like this one; wrote it months ago after reading about Boykin Curry & Celerie Kemble's development of THOUSANDS of acres in the Dominican Republic for an "artist colony" as reported in the March 20 New Yorker article by Ben McGrath


17 Comments:
hi,
very poignant and evocative discourse runs through the whole poem.Your powerful poem voices the unheard voices of those who have so much to say but hardly anyone is listening...
Ochean xorosho!
Spasiba Abhay. you flatter me too much. i don't know if i've effectively represented anyone--or that they'd even agree, but, i was upset by the article. not sure this does anything to rectify the situation. but i did send a copy to the culprits named in the poem. just to offer them another perspective on the situation.
gee. haven't heard from them though. hmmmm.;-)
so very well said in such few words Ozy. interesting that only one Dominican was interviewed. the local mayor. and under dubious circumstances if i recall correctly. the couple had thrown a beach party in his honor with free kettle drum rum for all! i was aghast...
My you can cut with the pen as well, my dear poetess. This poem is grand with so much rhyme and word play (I like the "just east of Key West").
A really nice peice that has (in my opinion) a light hearted feel as it is read, but the content is so serious. Bravo.
Yeah! I got a "bravo" from "Bob"!
though the subject matter is unfortunate, this is one of my favorites.
Hmmm. I was just thinking Bob, how this rubs against your own discontents with modernist rhetoric. For, I have no doubt that this will sway the shiny couple from gorging on the people and the land. just because they can.
Perhaps an artists colony providing capital input to a 3rd world economy is better than racing in with guns blazing.
Although 250000 acres seems quite a lot! 2500 would seem a lot!
(Have to say I'm shooting from the hip here as I don't know the whole story)
good point glenn. and that is their most viable argument--although they don't really argue it in the article b/c everyone is so punch-pleased with their creative "venture." huh! greedy overindulgence i say!
my alarm was sounded first with the ghastly girth of this "investment." 250,000 bloody acres!!!! i didn't even think the DR measured 250,000 acres (do have to check the stats on its size). not 50 or 250 but a quarter million. the second alarm went off when there was no talk of building--or rebuilding/fortifying the interior with an acquistion of that size. which seemed so culturally insensitive and cruel. i mean what about helping cultivate the indigenous artist rather than shipping in already established artists so they have a sunny place to escape their first world malaise! i was just so disgusted after i read the article (and read it initially w/o prejudice, just thought of it as a light read). no talk of helping build schools or hospitals no with that kind of old money dough. just bloody bungalows. colored bungalows of course.
it really is an interesting read glenn. your hands are full with sweet sweet cherubic things i know, but i'm sure it's in the new yorker archives online. curious to see if you think i'm overreacting...
HAving trouble finding the article... any url?
Cheers
Glenn
Darn. I looked as well. Apparently not significant enough to archive...
But following are some links that reference, summarize and/or comment on the article. The first one devotes the most attention to summarizing the article's contents without editorializing. The remaining two editorialize. ( I got sick to my stomach all over again reviewing them...but I really don't mean to prejudice you. REALLY. let me know what you think):
Under title: NEW YORKER MAG ON PLAYA GRANDE
http://www.dr1.com/travelnews/archive/2006/tnews040406.html
http://www.worldhum.com/weblog/item/a_creative_persons_utopia_in_the_dominican_republic_20060319/
http://www.radosh.net/archive/001451.html
Ok so I've had a read. The first two articles make it seem a reasonable proposition whilst the third attacks the man and his friends/associates more than the proposition. Not knowing anything much about him it means I have no tbias regards the person..his reply post in the third was quite interesting though .
I think I'll concentrate my thoughts on the proposition.
First it is 2200 acres -not so much, and it seems a fair price he is paying.
If the money is used to relieve economic problems in DR then so be it. I don't think anyone in this day and age is not aware that owning land has always been a basis of power. Perhaps they would have been wiser to lease the land for say a hundred years or something.
The people who would live/stay there are not really my concern, but I'm guessing it would be quite an interesting crowd -although it sounds like they would need to have some sort of financial wherewithal to participate .
The people of DR have a couple of methods of redress should they be made to feel inferior... They could all completely refuse to work in, or sell anything to the complex. Is this likely to happen? I doubt it. I think people will line up to increase their own wealth and prospects -be they less than the people who own the place. This has always been the way of the world.
Secondly the sovereign power has the right to deny entry to anyone not a citizen of their country - they could just not allow the visitors/owners to enter.
Thirdly they could nationalise the property.
I doubt any of these will happen because the benefits will probably outweigh the disadvantages...
Benefits would include; revenue, increased tourism, exposure for local talent, jobs and so forth. It seems to me the people of the DR could use the money.
(I wonder if this is any different to taking a holiday in say India, Thailand or Vietnam, where there is a great disparity in our incomes v theirs.)
Here in NZ Shania Twain just purchased over 50000 acres for around 15m. At the end of the day she can't take it anywhere.She has shown good intentions towards looking after it. We all worry that if we sell off all our land we will become serfs - The trick is not to let it all be sold! Colonialisation has always had advantages and disadvantages, and seems to be a continuous kind of process. American media would probably be better advised to concentrate on correcting the problems caused to native Americans by armed colonisation, than venting the politics of envy against those who might 'colonise ' via economic arrangement.
Cheers
Glenn
Just got the email that you posted and really appreciate your thoughtful mini-treatise glenn. really. (first, i have to review the NY article again--locate the hard copy to see how i came up with the 250,000 fig; if a gross mistake, well, a GROSS mistake and i'll make amends).
Certainly such ventures come bundled with advantages and disadvantages, but i guess i got the feeling that turning this into a Caribbean "Hamptons" results in more cultural dilution and the guilt is assuaged (as it always is) by this prospect of economic incentive. yes, i understand this is the way of the world. and tourism is the DR's main industry. i just am overcome by this sense of loss, loss, loss, no matter how much economic gain...
your point about "political envy" is well made. i know i myself am highly susceptible to this easy vitriol. but it does go beyond envy in my case. more like this overwhelming sense of powerlessness. here i am armed with a law degree, and in many ways i feel more powerless than before (reminds me of Ecclesiastes; with more knowledge comes more sadness/grief).
oh and what native americans?
i will give this more thought. and do appreciate your taking the time. you caught me at bedtime...'night.
Good morning..There is certainly cultural loss in the world:-( That said,poverty is nothing to aspire to.
I don't think I meant political envy so much as general envy and disparaging of those who have. Personally I think a lot of wealth should be redistributed, but it's hardly just to knock those who have won under the current system.
The figure of 2200 acres was from one of the articles you gave reference to.
It's better DR can sit at the table and negotiate on its own behalf than end up becoming dependent on aid.
I guess colonisation has always been taking place (10 million aliens anyone?) in all countries. Its better to hope it is peaceful.
I think one problem I didn't mention was the effect of overseas investors buying land and how it distorts the value in local terms , therefore leading to fewer locals being able to take a stake in their own country.
As you concurred, there are advantages and disadvantages to this type of occurence. Lets play the ball and not the player.
Cheers
Glenn
Hi Sheherazade,
Utterly new to reading blogs, but after reading yours I think I'm hooked. Really brilliant poem, in my not humble opinion. I don't think it really "envy" at work but a sort of frustration that Boykin et al don't have the imagination to establish anything truly creative. Or maybe it's envy.
As awful as it all sounds, I still would go, if for no other reason that seeing Charlie Rose in Shorts. One look at the vulnerability that I imagine his legs to be, and I'd be complety free of any envy. Throw in Thomas Friedman in a flip flops and a chest exposing robe, and I'd rather go to a dentist convention in Omaha.
Hello Alisa. I'm so glad you discovered me. Serendipity!
And thank you for the very generous praise. I do hope you'll visit again.
After the way he treats Dominicans in the article, I wish the country would nationalize the damn utopia and take it back from these snobs.
And what's with her name? Celerie?? Celerie?????
What? Her parents hated her and wanted to make sure she would turn out into a ridiculous human being? (if so, mission accomplished!!)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home